Post by account_disabled on Mar 10, 2024 20:27:55 GMT -7
On the contrary, it is the prosecutor's office and the court that are responsible for the proof activity. However, if an accusation of theft is made without evidence, there is a risk that a "decision not to prosecute" will be made at the investigation stage or the case will be rejected. The verdict will be given according to the conscientious opinion of the court as a result of the proving activity. principle of "freedom of evidence", any lawful evidence can be used to prove the crime of theft. According to the Supreme Court; Camera images, Finger print, Base station signal information, sound recording, Photograph, Confession, witness statement They are the most important evidence in the thef
Is theft seen on camera considered evidence? When Germany Phone Number Data considering whether the theft caught on camera is considered evidence , camera records are used as evidence in the theft cases heard in the criminal courts of first instance. Therefore, if there are security cameras at the place where the crime of theft is committed, it is possible to use them as evidence in the trial. “ On the contrary, it is the prosecutor's office and the court that are responsible for the proof activity. However, if an accusation of theft is made without evidence, there is a risk that a "decision not to prosecute" will be made at the investigation stage or the case will be rejected. The verdict will be given according to the conscientious opinion of the court as a result of the proving activity.
Within the framework of the principle of "freedom of evidence", any lawful evidence can be used to prove the crime of theft. According to the Supreme Court; Camera images, Finger print, Base station signal information, sound recording, Photograph, Confession, witness statement They are the most important evidence in the theft case. Is theft seen on camera considered evidence? When considering whether the theft caught on camera is considered evidence , camera records are used as evidence in the theft cases heard in the criminal courts of first instance. Therefore, if there are security cameras at the place where the crime of theft is committed, it is possible to use them as evidence in the trial. “
Is theft seen on camera considered evidence? When Germany Phone Number Data considering whether the theft caught on camera is considered evidence , camera records are used as evidence in the theft cases heard in the criminal courts of first instance. Therefore, if there are security cameras at the place where the crime of theft is committed, it is possible to use them as evidence in the trial. “ On the contrary, it is the prosecutor's office and the court that are responsible for the proof activity. However, if an accusation of theft is made without evidence, there is a risk that a "decision not to prosecute" will be made at the investigation stage or the case will be rejected. The verdict will be given according to the conscientious opinion of the court as a result of the proving activity.
Within the framework of the principle of "freedom of evidence", any lawful evidence can be used to prove the crime of theft. According to the Supreme Court; Camera images, Finger print, Base station signal information, sound recording, Photograph, Confession, witness statement They are the most important evidence in the theft case. Is theft seen on camera considered evidence? When considering whether the theft caught on camera is considered evidence , camera records are used as evidence in the theft cases heard in the criminal courts of first instance. Therefore, if there are security cameras at the place where the crime of theft is committed, it is possible to use them as evidence in the trial. “